The unintended consequences of free education?

Taken from Chris Blattman's blog:

From Guy Grossman and Evan Lieberman, this Ugandan New Vision article:

The day Government started paying tuition for all school going children, was the day parents ‘declared’ a holiday from taking care about their children’s education. What a shame.

Almost all school management committee became dull. Government stood at a distance and barked, but did not care to bite. Years down the road, the rot seems to be perforating its way through free education’s foundation in the country.

A decade down the road, Government is gradually realising that the parents stealthily put so much weight on its back, and this is gradually eating down the country’s quality of education.

And Evan’s two cents:

I’ve heard much the same thing from various head teachers in Kenya, absolutely lamenting the detrimental effects of free primary education (FPE)! The simple argument is that when parents don’t have to pay, they feel no stake in the school, no obligation to participate in management, and they simply delegate education to government. And because poor people in poor areas are not paying any kind of direct income tax, given low or non-existent incomes, they are not engaged in any type of fiscal contract. It’s pretty painful to think that in trying to provide universal primary education (and beyond) in these East African countries that the plan itself might actually be causing harm to the quality of learning.

The introduction of free education in Africa (or social security in Latin America) presents a short-lived opportunity to see the effect of government provision of education and other forms of welfare–relevant to US and European policy debates in this era of small government resurgence.

The laments of head teachers alone don’t convince me, but I would not be surprised if it were true. I pity that there are not (to my knowledge) studies taking advantage of the changes for a more rigorous answer.

Or are there? Reader suggestions welcome.

Mr Mandela on the power of education

I saw this and just had to share:

Courtesy of: http://www.motivationblog.org/nelson-mandela-quote-poster/#.UDKrvamPXup 

Was the current system of education designed for a different age?

One of the important questions Sir Ken Robinson answers in this must-watch video on Changing Education Paradigms.

Sir Ken Robinson suggests that children have been 'anaesthetised' to get through schooling, and instead we should be waking them up to discover what is inside of themselves. If this is the case then, the question is: at what stage do children learn what is inside themselves under the current education norms?

He also mentions that we need to go in the exact opposite direction of standardisation - I do agree, however struggle with how this plays out in practice. Is this why more and more people are turning towards homeschooling? Are schools currently stifling the critical - or divergent, as Sir Ken Robinson calls it - thinking abilities of children? It would be great to hear your thoughts.

Quick note: The video constantly refers to education, however I think that Sir Ken Robinson is talking about schooling. For more on the difference between schooling and education, take a look at this previous post. 

Education vs. Schooling - the same but different?

Apologies for the lack of blogging over the past week: I've been away from decent internet access, and I admit enjoying a bit of a blogging break as well.

I recently went to a seminar on the Capabilities Approach and the potential for it in helping to eradicate inequality in schools. One thing that I noticed was many people at the event were using the terms education and schooling as interchangeable terms. I think this needs to be questioned.

We might assume that learning and therefore education is 'happening' in schools, however how does schooling differ from education in general? Of course schooling is confined by age, education on the other hand is not. The main difference as I see it though is that on the whole schooling is something driven by the state, and therefore the content needs to come under close scrutiny. What is the purpose of the schooling agenda? State-building? Helping children to become good or better citizens?

Rather than giving schooling and education a definition myself, I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Is there one universal definition for both terms, or is it really dependent upon context? Does 'real' independent - here meaning non-state defined - learning only take place once we are adults? Do we question enough the content of the curricula in schools, or do we just assume that the state knows what our children should be learning?  

Get discussing below! 

    

Schooling: a creativity killer?

'But something strikes you when you move to America and when you travel around the world: Every education system on earth has the same hierarchy of subjects. Every one. Doesn't matter where you go. You'd think it would be otherwise, but it isn't. At the top are mathematics and languages, then the humanities, and the bottom are the arts. Everywhere on Earth. And in pretty much every system too, there's a hierarchy within the arts. Art and music are normally given a higher status in schools than drama and dance. There isn't an education system on the planet that teaches dance everyday to children the way we teach them mathematics. Why? Why not? I think this is rather important. I think math is very important, but so is dance. Children dance all the time if they're allowed to, we all do. We all have bodies, don't we? Did I miss a meeting? Truthfully, what happens is, as children grow up, we start to educate them progressively from the waist up. And then we focus on their heads. And slightly to one side. 

[...] 

In the next 30 years, according to UNESCO, more people worldwide will be graduating through education than since the beginning of history. More people, and it's the combination of all the things we've talked about -- technology and its transformation effect on work, and demography and the huge explosion in population. Suddenly, degrees aren't worth anything. Isn't that true? When I was a student, if you had a degree, you had a job. If you didn't have a job it's because you didn't want one. And I didn't want one, frankly. But now kids with degrees are often heading home to carry on playing video games, because you need an MA where the previous job required a BA, and now you need a PhD for the other. It's a process of academic inflation. And it indicates the whole structure of education is shifting beneath our feet. We need to radically rethink our view of intelligence.

[...]

And for the future, [education] won't serve us. We have to rethink the fundamental principles on which we're educating our children.' 

Taken from Sir Ken Robinson's talk on how schools kill creativity. Highlights the important distinction between education and schooling. 

What do you think? 

Does the international community focus more on schooling? Have we lost sight of education and the need for children to be creative throughout learning? Would be great to hear your thoughts - you can share them in the comments box below.